ChatDev alternatives (2026)
ChatDev is a coding tool: Zero-code multi-agent platform from OpenBMB, grown from a software-development agent company into a general multi-agent orchestration system. Pricing, as the maker states it: Open source. Its GitHub repo has 34,545 stars. We found 141 tools in the directory that do overlapping work (writing code, building multi-agent systems); 106 of them are open source and 9 list a free or freemium plan. Below are the 10 closest, ranked by how many tasks and sub-tasks they share with ChatDev, then by GitHub stars.
- Oh My Claudecode (Open source): Multi-agent orchestration layer for Claude Code that coordinates teams of specialized agents. Consider it because it also covers running many agents in parallel; it has more GitHub stars (39,972 vs 34,545).
- PentAGI (Open source): Autonomous multi-agent system for running penetration testing tasks. Consider it because it also covers penetration and security testing.
- Paseo (Open source): Orchestrate multiple coding agents from desktop and mobile. Consider it because it also covers running many agents in parallel and computer and desktop control.
- DeepCode (Open source): Open agentic coding system that turns papers and specs into code with multi-agent orchestration. Consider it because it also covers research and reports.
- Superset (Source-available): Agentic IDE for orchestrating many coding agents in parallel. Consider it because it also covers running many agents in parallel and IDE and editor agents.
- Agent Orchestrator (Open source): Runs and supervises teams of coding agents from planning to merge. Consider it because it also covers running many agents in parallel and planning and task tracking.
- Oh My OpenCode Slim (Open source): Lean multi-agent suite for OpenCode that mixes models and delegates tasks automatically. Consider it because it does the same job with a different approach (open source).
- SuperPlane (Open source): Open-source platform for orchestrating one-shot engineering work with agents. Consider it because it does the same job with a different approach (open source).
- DevOpsGPT (Source-available): Multi-agent system that combines LLMs with DevOps tools to turn natural-language requirements into working software on existing code. Consider it because it does the same job with a different approach (source-available).
- AutoDev (Open source): Multi-agent development platform built on Kotlin Multiplatform for research, coding, review and data queries across IntelliJ, VS Code, CLI and more. Consider it because it also covers research and reports and terminal and CLI agents.
ChatDev vs alternatives at a glance
| Tool | Pricing | Open source / licence | GitHub stars | Good for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChatDev | Open source | Yes | 34,545 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| Oh My Claudecode | Open source | MIT | 39,972 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| PentAGI | Open source | MIT | 30,728 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| Paseo | Open source | Apache-2.0 (third-party components under their own licences) | 21,143 | writing code, controlling a computer |
| DeepCode | Open source | MIT | 16,717 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| Superset | Source-available | Elastic License 2.0 (source-available) | 15,289 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| Agent Orchestrator | Open source | Apache License 2.0 | 13,253 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| Oh My OpenCode Slim | Open source | MIT | 9,588 | writing code, automating workflows |
| SuperPlane | Open source | Apache-2.0, except the /ee directory (SuperPlane Enterprise Edition License) | 7,825 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| DevOpsGPT | Source-available | No | 5,964 | writing code, building multi-agent systems |
| AutoDev | Open source | Yes | 4,558 | writing code, coding in the terminal |
More: ChatDev listing · All coding tools · All alternatives pages
Related searches: Multi-agent frameworks
Alternatives are picked from directory data only: same category plus shared tasks and sub-tasks. Pricing is as each maker states it; GitHub stars as recorded on each listing.